Consumers and The Industrial Internet of Things

Most everyone has encountered or purchased some form of a Consumer oriented Internet of Things device. Smart Thermostats, Light Switches and Light Bulbs are common and relatively inexpensive. On the grand scheme of things all of the small'ish devices and the energy, time and effort they save add up to significant savings.

The Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) is here
(Hint: It’s been here for a while)

Why Should People Care about IIoT? (click2tweet)

People should care about IIoT for a few reasons. Not the least of which are:

  1. Jobs – Big Companies are betting on the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT)
  2. Better Living Thru Computing
  3. Market Size - $3.7B in 2020 with a 32.6% CAGR and $60T by 2035 (via Forbes)

Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) is expected to top $60 trillion during the next 15 years.

Think Sensors

There are sensors in everything and the number of sensors if growing exponentially. Forbes

  • 2015 – 15 Billion
  • 2020 – 31 Billion
  • 2025 – 75 Billion

This is a good thing. More sensors might seem invasive (and they might be), but they also mean more data, more processing and Better Living Thru Computing (point #2 above). If the implication is that sensors know too much about us … there is a business opportunity here for big platform players and the partners that support them.

There is a virtuous cycle here:

Sensors –> Capturing Data (aka Big Data) –> Processing Data –>

Analyzing –> Taking Action –> Repeat –>

Every industry will be impacted … Beyond the obvious areas like Supply Chains and Logistics. Which are fundamental elements of every business.

One thing IIOT enables and allows is for a more meticulous following of the Lean Startup methodology that is based upon the “build-measure-learn” feedback loop. But, that’s the topic of another post. Read on for more about IIoT.

LI - IIOT - Human and Machine Connect with 1's and 0's

But, on a much larger scale there are significant economies of scale to receive the benefits of The Industrial Internet of Things. Big players are jumping into the IIOT space. They are doing this for a lot of reasons, but the usual driver is ever present … money.

Corporations are willing to spend to reduce costs and increase efficiencies. Which means the investments made today will pay dividends for years to come.

What does this has to do with consumers?

Why should people listening to this Breakthrough Byte care? The main reason is because, like racecars, the innovations developed in the IIOT space will trickle down to the Consumer IOT space.

Perhaps more important … these are the jobs people will be taking in the coming 5, 10 and 20 years. This Breakthrough Byte is focused on helping people understand a bit more about The Industrial Internet of Things and how they can make sure they position themselves to make the most of the IIOT.

Listen to the show on BBSRadio – My segment starts at about the 40 minute mark. But, listen to the whole show for the full effect.

SNAGHTML193240c5

Bullet Points

  • The Industrial Internet of Things is already shaping the way you work and will continue to be a hot area for job growth, innovation, and globalization.
  • Every aspect of manufacturing is being impacted by IIOT - from the design (CAD/CAM) to the manufacturing to the shipping and even the disassembly of products is being automated and optimized.
  • IIOT is, at its core, about the decoupling of devices from applications.
  • IIOT is about connecting THINGS to infrastructure (instead of to applications)
  • IIOT is about Intelligent Devices that help people as services become better, faster and with higher quality

As with every Breakthrough Byte segment I break it down into Pros, Cons and ROI. You may disagree with these points and if you do please drop a comment here so we can start a discussion.

Cons

  • More Security is needed and is being worked out (e.g. Your vehicle may push a lot of content and it has the potential to be intercepted and/or compromised. This is true with healthcare, buildings, mobile devices, IoT devices, etc.)

  • Data Effluent / Data Exhaust are being tracked more effectively. More work is required (hint: Opportunity)

  • Standards need to be approved and adopted (e.g. Blockchain)

Pros

  • Pervasive – Sensors are everywhere and expanding

  • Proven – It’s not in question WHETHER they work. It’s just WHERE they should be put to work that needs help and provides and opportunity across multiple levels on a global scale

  • Protected’ish (hint: this is a huge area of opportunity)

ROI

  • Safety – From the human aspect the 3D’s can be considered – Dirty, Dull, and Dangerous Tasks (HT Michio Kaku)
  • Reduced Time to Decisions / Better Decisions (Yes, Machines WILL be making decisions for you)
  • Real-Time – Continuous improvement with real-time feedback

Thanks for reading. If you want to continue the conversation … let’s go!

---
linkedinportrait-1444 (1 third smaller) from 3000 to 2000
Jeff is business advisor, mentor and community engagement expert. He brings over 20 years of Channel Sales, Partner Marketing and Alliance expertise to audiences around the world in speaking engagements and via his writing. He has worked for Microsoft, Kodak, and K2.

Connect with him on Twitter @jshuey

Or connect on LinkedIn, Facebook, or Google+

He is a contributing author to Entrepreneur, Elite Daily, Yahoo, US News and to
the Personal Branding Blog with over 250 articles published.

image

Comments

Karl Schulmeisters said…
on this one you are all wet. There is not a single thing \I can agree with. And I spent essentially 7 years in Consumer |IoT (BillG' s House) and another 6 in IIoT (Mfg Group in EPG)

first off
>>Most everyone has encountered or purchased some form of a Consumer oriented Internet of Things device. Smart Thermostats, Light Switches and Light Bulbs are common and relatively inexpensive. On the grand scheme of things all of the small'ish devices and the energy, time and effort they save add up to significant saving<<

the Exact OPPOSITE is true.. There is almost ZERO actual value add in the I part of IoT in those devices.
Smart Thermostats - you don't need intenet connectivy, you just need an extended period for the thermostat to learn the hysteresis of your house and your schedule. Anything more is added hassle with no value add

IoT Light swithes are EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE in comparison to basic ones: about 10x and that doesn't include the programing costs which are rather high. Remember, how YOU describe a space and the lights and plugs in it, varies from time to time, and varies MASSIVELY fto rom how your partner describes it. And the conflict is very real and very irritating to users (I know this the hard way)

And they really don't save very much on electricity

as for IIoT. IIoT has been with us essentially since the late 1970s. The only two things that have changes is that the cost of sensors is going down allowing for ever broader use. However we already are at a point where most of the data being collected is being thrown away.

For Example about 70% of the well head data on the BP Challenger disaster was basically being roundfiled on disk and not really being used

and the other is that our ability to apply statistical analysis aka AI to the data is slowly increasing.

but all of this is happening inside of firewalled SCADA systems (MSFT created the OPC - originally OLE for Process Control ) standard that has been a way for SCADA systems to interoperate across vendor boundaries for coming onto 2 decades now.

it is NOT and likely NEVER will be directly connected to the Internet (hence the second I in IIoT is bullshit) becaue of security and life safety issues: I spoke on the subject of this security at a conference 12 years ago where another presenter was a Univ. that almost had a building full of people killed. Why? because they had allowed the modem of their SCADA system to remain connected, and it had been hacked

and the folks who hacked it started playing with the boiler controls. Fortunately they didn't reset all of the alarms, and when their new settings caused an increase in pressure in the system (they didn't seem to know what they were doing) it triggered the alarm before the system generated enough high pressure steam to cause an explosion that would have killed most in the building

So for the last 2 decades, more and more Industrial systems have been GOING OFFLINE for security reasons

and almost all of the analysts following this field agree with me - seeing IIoT as simply a rebranding of the SCADA market that started in 1968 with the invention of the PLC by my friend Dick Morely
Jeff Shuey said…
As always ... Karl keeps me honest. I'm unpacking a few of these points and thinking them through. Thank you Karl. I really do appreciate your candor and willingness to jump in and share your thoughts and set things straight.