tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1782602018049227100.post3684021049016189898..comments2024-03-19T00:18:19.721-07:00Comments on The Intersection of People and Process: Records are the Assets of the OrganizationJeff Shueyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18330227001342433310noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1782602018049227100.post-24579063226731016092014-05-30T07:27:10.765-07:002014-05-30T07:27:10.765-07:00Great point. I use the word "content" ge...Great point. I use the word "content" generically to include all the same "artifacts" you mention.<br /><br />The title came from one of the things Andrew SanAgustin said. It's the line that got me thinking of the blog post. And, in true Microsoft fashion, this is a way to tilt the conversation.Jeff Shueyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18330227001342433310noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1782602018049227100.post-22870138525223130512014-05-30T07:03:58.007-07:002014-05-30T07:03:58.007-07:00I prefer to use the term "artifact" over...I prefer to use the term "artifact" over records, documentation, or assets, as it can be used to define a broad range of content: word documents, powerpoint, jpeg's, CAD files, AVI's, and so forth -- all of which can be managed together or separately, and all of which are intellectual property of the organization. It may be a semantic point, but people get caught up on language, and I've run across quite a few folks who seem to get stuck on use of the word "asset." Just my two cents.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com